College Recruiting Times

Division III men's 200 IM college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 200 IM across 176 men's Division III teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

1:59.73

Typical roster median

2:05.38

Typical depth tier

2:18.36

Fast-program scorer tier

1:55.93

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 176 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
EmoryAtlanta, GA · Division IIIAtlanta, GA · 12 swimmers
121:50.931:49.27 to score1:49.27
2
Johns HopkinsBaltimore, MD · Division IIIBaltimore, MD · 10 swimmers
101:52.821:50.21 to score1:50.21
3
Carnegie MellonPittsburgh, PA · Division IIIPittsburgh, PA · 11 swimmers
111:53.051:50.21 to score1:50.21
4
DenisonGranville, OH · Division IIIGranville, OH · 18 swimmers
181:53.461:49.68 to score1:49.68
5
NYUNew York, NY · Division IIINew York, NY · 14 swimmers
141:53.521:50.41 to score1:50.41
6
St. Thomas (TX)Houston, TX · Division IIIHouston, TX · 8 swimmers
81:53.561:52.52 to score1:52.52
7
Wash USaint Louis, MO · Division IIISaint Louis, MO · 17 swimmers
171:53.861:51.79 to score1:51.79
8
AmherstAmherst, MA · Division IIIAmherst, MA · 8 swimmers
81:54.241:52.81 to score1:52.81
9
ChicagoChicago, IL · Division IIIChicago, IL · 12 swimmers
121:54.291:51.95 to score1:51.95
10
TCNJEwing, NJ · Division IIIEwing, NJ · 16 swimmers
161:54.701:52.88 to score1:52.88
11
GettysburgGettysburg, PA · Division IIIGettysburg, PA · 10 swimmers
101:54.941:53.78 to score1:53.78
12
KenyonGambier, OH · Division IIIGambier, OH · 14 swimmers
141:55.151:53.28 to score1:53.28
13
TuftsMedford, MA · Division IIIMedford, MA · 11 swimmers
111:55.271:51.50 to score1:51.50
14
WhitworthSpokane, WA · Division IIISpokane, WA · 7 swimmers
71:55.461:52.72 to score1:52.72
15
Connecticut CollegeNew London, CT · Division IIINew London, CT · 6 swimmers
61:55.641:51.07 to score1:51.07
16
RhodesMemphis, TN · Division IIIMemphis, TN · 6 swimmers
61:55.671:52.02 to score1:52.02
17
WilliamsWilliamstown, MA · Division IIIWilliamstown, MA · 18 swimmers
181:56.421:53.23 to score1:53.23
18
HamiltonClinton, NY · Division IIIClinton, NY · 7 swimmers
71:56.501:51.27 to score1:51.27
19
MITCambridge, MA · Division IIICambridge, MA · 19 swimmers
191:56.561:50.41 to score1:50.41
20
Case Western ReserveCleveland, OH · Division IIICleveland, OH · 14 swimmers
141:56.691:52.88 to score1:52.88
21
CalvinGrand Rapids, MI · Division IIIGrand Rapids, MI · 19 swimmers
191:56.941:55.34 to score1:55.34
22
CMSClaremont, CA · Division IIIClaremont, CA · 15 swimmers
151:57.281:52.78 to score1:52.78
23
Washington & LeeLexington, VA · Division IIILexington, VA · 13 swimmers
131:57.371:54.74 to score1:54.74
24
RITRochester, NY · Division IIIRochester, NY · 11 swimmers
111:57.401:55.41 to score1:55.41
25
Trinity (TX)San Antonio, TX · Division IIISan Antonio, TX · 13 swimmers
131:57.641:52.98 to score1:52.98
← PreviousPage 1 of 8Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 200 IM. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.