College Recruiting Times

Division III women's 200 IM college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 200 IM across 203 women's Division III teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

2:19.16

Typical roster median

2:25.05

Typical depth tier

2:36.81

Fast-program scorer tier

2:14.46

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 203 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
EmoryAtlanta, GA · Division IIIAtlanta, GA · 15 swimmers
152:07.032:05.39 to score2:05.39
2
NYUNew York, NY · Division IIINew York, NY · 13 swimmers
132:07.332:05.44 to score2:05.44
3
MITCambridge, MA · Division IIICambridge, MA · 17 swimmers
172:08.182:06.04 to score2:06.04
4
WilliamsWilliamstown, MA · Division IIIWilliamstown, MA · 12 swimmers
122:08.592:04.36 to score2:04.36
5
TuftsMedford, MA · Division IIIMedford, MA · 10 swimmers
102:09.462:06.62 to score2:06.62
6
Carnegie MellonPittsburgh, PA · Division IIIPittsburgh, PA · 13 swimmers
132:10.152:08.41 to score2:08.41
7
SwarthmoreSwarthmore, PA · Division IIISwarthmore, PA · 12 swimmers
122:10.692:07.59 to score2:07.59
8
Johns HopkinsBaltimore, MD · Division IIIBaltimore, MD · 12 swimmers
122:10.702:08.90 to score2:08.90
9
ChicagoChicago, IL · Division IIIChicago, IL · 12 swimmers
122:11.082:08.29 to score2:08.29
10
DenisonGranville, OH · Division IIIGranville, OH · 11 swimmers
112:11.682:04.10 to score2:04.10
11
St. Thomas (TX)Houston, TX · Division IIIHouston, TX · 13 swimmers
132:11.722:10.66 to score2:10.66
12
Trinity (TX)San Antonio, TX · Division IIISan Antonio, TX · 11 swimmers
112:11.832:08.66 to score2:08.66
13
ColbyWaterville, ME · Division IIIWaterville, ME · 13 swimmers
132:12.312:10.70 to score2:10.70
14
KeanUnion, NJ · Division IIIUnion, NJ · 9 swimmers
92:12.742:10.29 to score2:10.29
15
BowdoinBrunswick, ME · Division IIIBrunswick, ME · 9 swimmers
92:12.792:11.25 to score2:11.25
16
MiddleburyMiddlebury, VT · Division IIIMiddlebury, VT · 10 swimmers
102:12.822:10.92 to score2:10.92
17
KenyonGambier, OH · Division IIIGambier, OH · 20 swimmers
202:13.152:10.59 to score2:10.59
18
AmherstAmherst, MA · Division IIIAmherst, MA · 6 swimmers
62:13.202:08.79 to score2:08.79
19
CMSClaremont, CA · Division IIIClaremont, CA · 14 swimmers
142:13.282:07.64 to score2:07.64
20
RhodesMemphis, TN · Division IIIMemphis, TN · 8 swimmers
82:13.412:11.40 to score2:11.40
21
GettysburgGettysburg, PA · Division IIIGettysburg, PA · 13 swimmers
132:13.412:09.60 to score2:09.60
22
Wash USaint Louis, MO · Division IIISaint Louis, MO · 17 swimmers
172:13.572:08.75 to score2:08.75
23
HamiltonClinton, NY · Division IIIClinton, NY · 8 swimmers
82:13.962:12.04 to score2:12.04
24
UC Santa CruzSanta Cruz, CA · Division IIISanta Cruz, CA · 19 swimmers
192:14.222:09.30 to score2:09.30
25
Connecticut CollegeNew London, CT · Division IIINew London, CT · 8 swimmers
82:14.312:12.82 to score2:12.82
← PreviousPage 1 of 9Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 200 IM. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.