College Recruiting Times

Division III men's 200 Free college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 200 Free across 204 men's Division III teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

1:48.30

Typical roster median

1:52.86

Typical depth tier

2:05.59

Fast-program scorer tier

1:44.69

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 204 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
WilliamsWilliamstown, MA · Division IIIWilliamstown, MA · 15 swimmers
151:40.701:39.65 to score1:39.65
2
EmoryAtlanta, GA · Division IIIAtlanta, GA · 18 swimmers
181:40.811:39.90 to score1:39.90
3
MITCambridge, MA · Division IIICambridge, MA · 16 swimmers
161:41.141:40.06 to score1:40.06
4
TCNJEwing, NJ · Division IIIEwing, NJ · 17 swimmers
171:41.361:40.34 to score1:40.34
5
Carnegie MellonPittsburgh, PA · Division IIIPittsburgh, PA · 12 swimmers
121:41.581:40.08 to score1:40.08
6
NYUNew York, NY · Division IIINew York, NY · 20 swimmers
201:42.501:40.27 to score1:40.27
7
Johns HopkinsBaltimore, MD · Division IIIBaltimore, MD · 14 swimmers
141:42.521:40.49 to score1:40.49
8
St. Thomas (TX)Houston, TX · Division IIIHouston, TX · 7 swimmers
71:42.671:40.99 to score1:40.99
9
TuftsMedford, MA · Division IIIMedford, MA · 17 swimmers
171:42.981:41.13 to score1:41.13
10
DenisonGranville, OH · Division IIIGranville, OH · 29 swimmers
291:43.201:40.01 to score1:40.01
11
Wash USaint Louis, MO · Division IIISaint Louis, MO · 21 swimmers
211:43.431:39.88 to score1:39.88
12
KenyonGambier, OH · Division IIIGambier, OH · 22 swimmers
221:43.511:41.60 to score1:41.60
13
CMSClaremont, CA · Division IIIClaremont, CA · 19 swimmers
191:43.521:41.94 to score1:41.94
14
Trinity (TX)San Antonio, TX · Division IIISan Antonio, TX · 13 swimmers
131:43.621:43.04 to score1:43.04
15
UC Santa CruzSanta Cruz, CA · Division IIISanta Cruz, CA · 16 swimmers
161:43.711:42.25 to score1:42.25
16
HamiltonClinton, NY · Division IIIClinton, NY · 14 swimmers
141:43.881:41.22 to score1:41.22
17
ChicagoChicago, IL · Division IIIChicago, IL · 14 swimmers
141:43.931:40.50 to score1:40.50
18
Washington & LeeLexington, VA · Division IIILexington, VA · 13 swimmers
131:44.021:43.57 to score1:43.57
19
Case Western ReserveCleveland, OH · Division IIICleveland, OH · 18 swimmers
181:44.261:41.40 to score1:41.40
20
SalisburySalisbury, MD · Division IIISalisbury, MD · 20 swimmers
201:44.371:42.26 to score1:42.26
21
GettysburgGettysburg, PA · Division IIIGettysburg, PA · 16 swimmers
161:44.621:41.94 to score1:41.94
22
Pomona-PitzerClaremont, CA · Division IIIClaremont, CA · 15 swimmers
151:44.631:40.01 to score1:40.01
23
AmherstAmherst, MA · Division IIIAmherst, MA · 14 swimmers
141:44.671:41.26 to score1:41.26
24
MiddleburyMiddlebury, VT · Division IIIMiddlebury, VT · 11 swimmers
111:44.781:42.52 to score1:42.52
25
RITRochester, NY · Division IIIRochester, NY · 11 swimmers
111:44.851:42.41 to score1:42.41
← PreviousPage 1 of 9Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 200 Free. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.