College Recruiting Times

Division III women's 500 Free college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 500 Free across 206 women's Division III teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

5:30.33

Typical roster median

5:44.61

Typical depth tier

6:17.08

Fast-program scorer tier

5:19.00

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 206 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
EmoryAtlanta, GA · Division IIIAtlanta, GA · 10 swimmers
105:01.914:56.91 to score4:56.91
2
DenisonGranville, OH · Division IIIGranville, OH · 9 swimmers
95:03.834:58.17 to score4:58.17
3
KenyonGambier, OH · Division IIIGambier, OH · 11 swimmers
115:03.974:57.35 to score4:57.35
4
WilliamsWilliamstown, MA · Division IIIWilliamstown, MA · 9 swimmers
95:07.095:03.79 to score5:03.79
5
TuftsMedford, MA · Division IIIMedford, MA · 6 swimmers
65:07.125:01.33 to score5:01.33
6
Pomona-PitzerClaremont, CA · Division IIIClaremont, CA · 8 swimmers
85:08.545:06.57 to score5:06.57
7
St. Thomas (TX)Houston, TX · Division IIIHouston, TX · 7 swimmers
75:09.145:04.93 to score5:04.93
8
NYUNew York, NY · Division IIINew York, NY · 10 swimmers
105:09.394:54.24 to score4:54.24
9
CMSClaremont, CA · Division IIIClaremont, CA · 9 swimmers
95:09.455:02.74 to score5:02.74
10
Johns HopkinsBaltimore, MD · Division IIIBaltimore, MD · 6 swimmers
65:10.615:05.44 to score5:05.44
11
ChicagoChicago, IL · Division IIIChicago, IL · 9 swimmers
95:10.635:04.19 to score5:04.19
12
MiddleburyMiddlebury, VT · Division IIIMiddlebury, VT · 7 swimmers
75:11.115:04.61 to score5:04.61
13
AmherstAmherst, MA · Division IIIAmherst, MA · 7 swimmers
75:11.755:03.51 to score5:03.51
14
MITCambridge, MA · Division IIICambridge, MA · 12 swimmers
125:11.855:00.47 to score5:00.47
15
BowdoinBrunswick, ME · Division IIIBrunswick, ME · 7 swimmers
75:12.195:10.44 to score5:10.44
16
Wash USaint Louis, MO · Division IIISaint Louis, MO · 13 swimmers
135:12.365:07.20 to score5:07.20
17
GettysburgGettysburg, PA · Division IIIGettysburg, PA · 12 swimmers
125:14.385:11.11 to score5:11.11
18
UW-Eau ClaireEau Claire, WI · Division IIIEau Claire, WI · 9 swimmers
95:15.375:10.19 to score5:10.19
19
Carnegie MellonPittsburgh, PA · Division IIIPittsburgh, PA · 9 swimmers
95:16.535:09.33 to score5:09.33
20
SalisburySalisbury, MD · Division IIISalisbury, MD · 20 swimmers
205:16.785:07.42 to score5:07.42
21
Coast GuardNew London, CT · Division IIINew London, CT · 6 swimmers
65:16.875:13.71 to score5:13.71
22
UC Santa CruzSanta Cruz, CA · Division IIISanta Cruz, CA · 13 swimmers
135:17.085:12.23 to score5:12.23
23
ColbyWaterville, ME · Division IIIWaterville, ME · 8 swimmers
85:18.095:11.12 to score5:11.12
24
Case Western ReserveCleveland, OH · Division IIICleveland, OH · 11 swimmers
115:19.485:14.04 to score5:14.04
25
DePauwGreencastle, IN · Division IIIGreencastle, IN · 8 swimmers
85:19.665:11.85 to score5:11.85
← PreviousPage 1 of 9Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 500 Free. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.