College Recruiting Times

Division III women's 200 Free college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 200 Free across 226 women's Division III teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

2:03.52

Typical roster median

2:08.68

Typical depth tier

2:23.75

Fast-program scorer tier

1:59.68

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 226 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
ChicagoChicago, IL · Division IIIChicago, IL · 15 swimmers
151:53.821:53.06 to score1:53.06
2
EmoryAtlanta, GA · Division IIIAtlanta, GA · 16 swimmers
161:54.481:52.44 to score1:52.44
3
MITCambridge, MA · Division IIICambridge, MA · 16 swimmers
161:54.511:51.78 to score1:51.78
4
NYUNew York, NY · Division IIINew York, NY · 15 swimmers
151:54.681:50.05 to score1:50.05
5
TuftsMedford, MA · Division IIIMedford, MA · 16 swimmers
161:54.941:53.13 to score1:53.13
6
KenyonGambier, OH · Division IIIGambier, OH · 20 swimmers
201:54.941:53.11 to score1:53.11
7
Johns HopkinsBaltimore, MD · Division IIIBaltimore, MD · 11 swimmers
111:54.941:52.54 to score1:52.54
8
AmherstAmherst, MA · Division IIIAmherst, MA · 12 swimmers
121:55.541:52.03 to score1:52.03
9
DenisonGranville, OH · Division IIIGranville, OH · 14 swimmers
141:55.601:52.30 to score1:52.30
10
IthacaIthaca, NY · Division IIIIthaca, NY · 9 swimmers
91:57.131:56.18 to score1:56.18
11
Carnegie MellonPittsburgh, PA · Division IIIPittsburgh, PA · 18 swimmers
181:57.241:54.70 to score1:54.70
12
Pomona-PitzerClaremont, CA · Division IIIClaremont, CA · 18 swimmers
181:57.371:52.07 to score1:52.07
13
Trinity (TX)San Antonio, TX · Division IIISan Antonio, TX · 13 swimmers
131:57.591:54.42 to score1:54.42
14
WilliamsWilliamstown, MA · Division IIIWilliamstown, MA · 18 swimmers
181:57.641:53.87 to score1:53.87
15
UC Santa CruzSanta Cruz, CA · Division IIISanta Cruz, CA · 17 swimmers
171:57.721:56.23 to score1:56.23
16
St. Thomas (TX)Houston, TX · Division IIIHouston, TX · 12 swimmers
121:57.971:56.05 to score1:56.05
17
Wash USaint Louis, MO · Division IIISaint Louis, MO · 21 swimmers
211:58.091:54.68 to score1:54.68
18
ColbyWaterville, ME · Division IIIWaterville, ME · 13 swimmers
131:58.331:54.85 to score1:54.85
19
CMSClaremont, CA · Division IIIClaremont, CA · 19 swimmers
191:58.371:53.59 to score1:53.59
20
BowdoinBrunswick, ME · Division IIIBrunswick, ME · 12 swimmers
121:58.431:56.15 to score1:56.15
21
MiddleburyMiddlebury, VT · Division IIIMiddlebury, VT · 15 swimmers
151:58.501:55.85 to score1:55.85
22
HopeHolland, MI · Division IIIHolland, MI · 21 swimmers
211:58.531:56.12 to score1:56.12
23
GettysburgGettysburg, PA · Division IIIGettysburg, PA · 15 swimmers
151:58.571:56.69 to score1:56.69
24
Washington & LeeLexington, VA · Division IIILexington, VA · 16 swimmers
161:58.751:57.82 to score1:57.82
25
BatesLewiston, ME · Division IIILewiston, ME · 15 swimmers
151:59.011:57.49 to score1:57.49
← PreviousPage 1 of 10Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 200 Free. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.