College Recruiting Times

Division II men's 100 Back college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 100 Back across 70 men's Division II teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

51.87

Typical roster median

54.54

Typical depth tier

1:00.62

Fast-program scorer tier

50.47

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 70 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
TampaTampa, FL · Division IITampa, FL · 9 swimmers
948.4647.86 to score47.86
2
Wingate UniversityWingate, NC · Division IIWingate, NC · 6 swimmers
649.3947.98 to score47.98
3
Florida TechMelbourne, FL · Division IIMelbourne, FL · 6 swimmers
649.5249.46 to score49.46
4
Colorado MesaGrand Junction, CO · Division IIGrand Junction, CO · 10 swimmers
1049.7349.30 to score49.30
5
McKendree UniversityLebanon, IL · Division IILebanon, IL · 10 swimmers
1050.1748.76 to score48.76
6
Grand Valley StateAllendale, MI · Division IIAllendale, MI · 12 swimmers
1250.2449.89 to score49.89
7
Drury UniversitySpringfield, MO · Division IISpringfield, MO · 19 swimmers
1950.7948.04 to score48.04
8
Nova SoutheasternFort Lauderdale, FL · Division IIFort Lauderdale, FL · 6 swimmers
650.8148.69 to score48.69
9
IndianapolisIndianapolis, IN · Division IIIndianapolis, IN · 14 swimmers
1450.9949.06 to score49.06
10
Lynn UniversityBoca Raton, FL · Division IIBoca Raton, FL · 10 swimmers
1051.0348.58 to score48.58
11
Saginaw Valley StateUniversity Center, MI · Division IIUniversity Center, MI · 6 swimmers
651.1349.94 to score49.94
12
Northern MichiganMarquette, MI · Division IIMarquette, MI · 7 swimmers
751.2849.61 to score49.61
13
Wayne State (MI)Detroit, MI · Division IIDetroit, MI · 11 swimmers
1151.5848.27 to score48.27
14
Missouri S&TRolla, MO · Division IIRolla, MO · 6 swimmers
651.5950.22 to score50.22
15
UMSLSt. Louis, MO · Division IISt. Louis, MO · 9 swimmers
951.6251.27 to score51.27
16
Florida Southern CollegeLakeland, FL · Division IILakeland, FL · 10 swimmers
1051.6349.32 to score49.32
17
Delta StateCleveland, MS · Division IICleveland, MS · 5 swimmers
551.7850.53 to score50.53
18
GannonErie, PA · Division IIErie, PA · 10 swimmers
1051.8350.66 to score50.66
19
St. Cloud StateSt. Cloud, MN · Division IISt. Cloud, MN · 14 swimmers
1451.8949.14 to score49.14
20
Henderson StateArkadelphia, AR · Division IIArkadelphia, AR · 12 swimmers
1251.9451.29 to score51.29
21
Catawba CollegeSalisbury, NC · Division IISalisbury, NC · 9 swimmers
951.9851.69 to score51.69
22
Carson-Newman UniversityJefferson City, TN · Division IIJefferson City, TN · 9 swimmers
952.1449.51 to score49.51
23
Rollins CollegeWinter Park, FL · Division IIWinter Park, FL · 10 swimmers
1052.2850.93 to score50.93
24
West ChesterWest Chester, PA · Division IIWest Chester, PA · 8 swimmers
852.5750.45 to score50.45
25
Ouachita BaptistArkadelphia, AR · Division IIArkadelphia, AR · 20 swimmers
2052.7551.18 to score51.18
← PreviousPage 1 of 3Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 100 Back. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.