College Recruiting Times

Division II men's 100 Free college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 100 Free across 75 men's Division II teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

46.72

Typical roster median

48.68

Typical depth tier

53.17

Fast-program scorer tier

45.97

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 75 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
Florida TechMelbourne, FL · Division IIMelbourne, FL · 16 swimmers
1645.6245.16 to score45.16
2
Colorado MesaGrand Junction, CO · Division IIGrand Junction, CO · 18 swimmers
1845.6544.54 to score44.54
3
Catawba CollegeSalisbury, NC · Division IISalisbury, NC · 11 swimmers
1145.9045.18 to score45.18
4
TampaTampa, FL · Division IITampa, FL · 20 swimmers
2046.0544.38 to score44.38
5
Grand Valley StateAllendale, MI · Division IIAllendale, MI · 20 swimmers
2046.1745.09 to score45.09
6
Wingate UniversityWingate, NC · Division IIWingate, NC · 17 swimmers
1746.3444.60 to score44.60
7
Lynn UniversityBoca Raton, FL · Division IIBoca Raton, FL · 19 swimmers
1946.4345.46 to score45.46
8
Northern MichiganMarquette, MI · Division IIMarquette, MI · 12 swimmers
1246.4444.67 to score44.67
9
Drury UniversitySpringfield, MO · Division IISpringfield, MO · 26 swimmers
2646.7545.21 to score45.21
10
Missouri S&TRolla, MO · Division IIRolla, MO · 17 swimmers
1746.8346.26 to score46.26
11
FindlayFindlay, OH · Division IIFindlay, OH · 17 swimmers
1746.9645.56 to score45.56
12
Florida Southern CollegeLakeland, FL · Division IILakeland, FL · 18 swimmers
1847.0244.67 to score44.67
13
IndianapolisIndianapolis, IN · Division IIIndianapolis, IN · 29 swimmers
2947.0645.27 to score45.27
14
UMSLSt. Louis, MO · Division IISt. Louis, MO · 13 swimmers
1347.1446.34 to score46.34
15
Nova SoutheasternFort Lauderdale, FL · Division IIFort Lauderdale, FL · 17 swimmers
1747.1845.05 to score45.05
16
Rollins CollegeWinter Park, FL · Division IIWinter Park, FL · 22 swimmers
2247.2245.97 to score45.97
17
Simon FraserBurnaby, BC · Division IIBurnaby, BC · 5 swimmers
547.2747.00 to score47.00
18
Saginaw Valley StateUniversity Center, MI · Division IIUniversity Center, MI · 24 swimmers
2447.2946.33 to score46.33
19
McKendree UniversityLebanon, IL · Division IILebanon, IL · 19 swimmers
1947.3145.31 to score45.31
20
West ChesterWest Chester, PA · Division IIWest Chester, PA · 13 swimmers
1347.3846.05 to score46.05
21
Rockhurst UniversityKansas City, MO · Division IIKansas City, MO · 14 swimmers
1447.4046.88 to score46.88
22
St. Cloud StateSt. Cloud, MN · Division IISt. Cloud, MN · 26 swimmers
2647.6045.30 to score45.30
23
Delta StateCleveland, MS · Division IICleveland, MS · 18 swimmers
1847.6246.54 to score46.54
24
GannonErie, PA · Division IIErie, PA · 15 swimmers
1547.6946.41 to score46.41
25
Carson-Newman UniversityJefferson City, TN · Division IIJefferson City, TN · 19 swimmers
1947.7145.51 to score45.51
← PreviousPage 1 of 3Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 100 Free. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.