College Recruiting Times

Division II women's 100 Back college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 100 Back across 92 women's Division II teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

59.88

Typical roster median

1:02.77

Typical depth tier

1:09.48

Fast-program scorer tier

58.26

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 92 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
Delta StateCleveland, MS · Division IICleveland, MS · 6 swimmers
654.9554.40 to score54.40
2
TampaTampa, FL · Division IITampa, FL · 13 swimmers
1357.0855.79 to score55.79
3
Colorado MesaGrand Junction, CO · Division IIGrand Junction, CO · 8 swimmers
857.4755.98 to score55.98
4
West FloridaPensacola, FL · Division IIPensacola, FL · 10 swimmers
1057.5655.61 to score55.61
5
Nova SoutheasternFort Lauderdale, FL · Division IIFort Lauderdale, FL · 7 swimmers
757.7656.44 to score56.44
6
Wingate UniversityWingate, NC · Division IIWingate, NC · 13 swimmers
1358.4756.84 to score56.84
7
Florida TechMelbourne, FL · Division IIMelbourne, FL · 8 swimmers
858.5757.66 to score57.66
8
Catawba CollegeSalisbury, NC · Division IISalisbury, NC · 14 swimmers
1458.8156.99 to score56.99
9
Augustana (SD)Sioux Falls, SD · Division IISioux Falls, SD · 11 swimmers
1158.8157.61 to score57.61
10
Carson-Newman UniversityJefferson City, TN · Division IIJefferson City, TN · 11 swimmers
1158.8957.85 to score57.85
11
Grand Valley StateAllendale, MI · Division IIAllendale, MI · 11 swimmers
1159.0157.02 to score57.02
12
UNC PembrokePembroke, NC · Division IIPembroke, NC · 5 swimmers
559.0958.97 to score58.97
13
CSU PuebloPueblo, CO · Division IIPueblo, CO · 7 swimmers
759.2757.24 to score57.24
14
Cal State East BayHayward, CA · Division IIHayward, CA · 10 swimmers
1059.2857.20 to score57.20
15
Northern MichiganMarquette, MI · Division IIMarquette, MI · 10 swimmers
1059.3856.26 to score56.26
16
UMSLSt. Louis, MO · Division IISt. Louis, MO · 7 swimmers
759.4258.22 to score58.22
17
West ChesterWest Chester, PA · Division IIWest Chester, PA · 4 swimmers
459.4257.81 to score57.81
18
Drury UniversitySpringfield, MO · Division IISpringfield, MO · 13 swimmers
1359.5057.52 to score57.52
19
St. Cloud StateSt. Cloud, MN · Division IISt. Cloud, MN · 9 swimmers
959.7058.67 to score58.67
20
Rollins CollegeWinter Park, FL · Division IIWinter Park, FL · 5 swimmers
559.8159.47 to score59.47
21
PennWest ClarionClarion, PA · Division IIClarion, PA · 11 swimmers
1159.8358.54 to score58.54
22
McKendree UniversityLebanon, IL · Division IILebanon, IL · 6 swimmers
659.8658.31 to score58.31
23
Lynn UniversityBoca Raton, FL · Division IIBoca Raton, FL · 10 swimmers
101:00.0457.36 to score57.36
24
Western ColoradoGunnison, CO · Division IIGunnison, CO · 12 swimmers
121:00.1259.04 to score59.04
25
Minnesota State MankatoMankato, MN · Division IIMankato, MN · 21 swimmers
211:00.1357.69 to score57.69
← PreviousPage 1 of 4Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 100 Back. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.