College Recruiting Times

Division II women's 100 Fly college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 100 Fly across 93 women's Division II teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

59.69

Typical roster median

1:02.32

Typical depth tier

1:08.88

Fast-program scorer tier

58.54

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 93 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
Delta StateCleveland, MS · Division IICleveland, MS · 13 swimmers
1357.3055.77 to score55.77
2
Colorado MesaGrand Junction, CO · Division IIGrand Junction, CO · 19 swimmers
1957.8556.30 to score56.30
3
TampaTampa, FL · Division IITampa, FL · 22 swimmers
2258.0556.12 to score56.12
4
IndianapolisIndianapolis, IN · Division IIIndianapolis, IN · 19 swimmers
1958.0756.07 to score56.07
5
Florida TechMelbourne, FL · Division IIMelbourne, FL · 8 swimmers
858.0957.24 to score57.24
6
UNC PembrokePembroke, NC · Division IIPembroke, NC · 9 swimmers
958.4558.23 to score58.23
7
McKendree UniversityLebanon, IL · Division IILebanon, IL · 5 swimmers
558.4958.28 to score58.28
8
Catawba CollegeSalisbury, NC · Division IISalisbury, NC · 11 swimmers
1158.6855.61 to score55.61
9
Lynn UniversityBoca Raton, FL · Division IIBoca Raton, FL · 9 swimmers
959.0355.87 to score55.87
10
Nova SoutheasternFort Lauderdale, FL · Division IIFort Lauderdale, FL · 16 swimmers
1659.0957.42 to score57.42
11
Hillsdale CollegeHillsdale, MI · Division IIHillsdale, MI · 12 swimmers
1259.6259.02 to score59.02
12
Florida Southern CollegeLakeland, FL · Division IILakeland, FL · 14 swimmers
1459.6758.19 to score58.19
13
Simon FraserBurnaby, BC · Division IIBurnaby, BC · 9 swimmers
959.7457.10 to score57.10
14
Wingate UniversityWingate, NC · Division IIWingate, NC · 22 swimmers
2259.7457.17 to score57.17
15
Colorado MinesGolden, CO · Division IIGolden, CO · 20 swimmers
2059.8457.18 to score57.18
16
Grand Valley StateAllendale, MI · Division IIAllendale, MI · 23 swimmers
231:00.0757.56 to score57.56
17
Northern MichiganMarquette, MI · Division IIMarquette, MI · 19 swimmers
191:00.1758.15 to score58.15
18
Sioux FallsSioux Falls, SD · Division IISioux Falls, SD · 10 swimmers
101:00.2258.76 to score58.76
19
Drury UniversitySpringfield, MO · Division IISpringfield, MO · 14 swimmers
141:00.3555.64 to score55.64
20
Azusa PacificAzusa, CA · Division IIAzusa, CA · 10 swimmers
101:00.3857.56 to score57.56
21
St. Cloud StateSt. Cloud, MN · Division IISt. Cloud, MN · 18 swimmers
181:00.5459.30 to score59.30
22
William Jewell CollegeLiberty, MO · Division IILiberty, MO · 13 swimmers
131:00.5658.96 to score58.96
23
West FloridaPensacola, FL · Division IIPensacola, FL · 13 swimmers
131:00.7058.99 to score58.99
24
Cal State East BayHayward, CA · Division IIHayward, CA · 11 swimmers
111:00.7757.02 to score57.02
25
Augustana (SD)Sioux Falls, SD · Division IISioux Falls, SD · 20 swimmers
201:00.9859.22 to score59.22
← PreviousPage 1 of 4Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 100 Fly. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.