College Recruiting Times

Division II women's 50 Free college swimming recruiting times

Updated July 2026 · 2025-26 season roster times

Take a look at the 50 Free across 95 women's Division II teams. Open a school to see the rest of its team’s times.

Typical roster reference points

Typical scorer tier

25.08

Typical roster median

26.05

Typical depth tier

29.22

Fast-program scorer tier

24.54

These are the middle values across the schools shown. Scorer covers a roster’s top quarter; median is the middle time; depth is the back quarter.

Showing 1–25 of 95 programs

#SchoolRosterMedianTo scoreSave
1
TampaTampa, FL · Division IITampa, FL · 24 swimmers
2424.1823.78 to score23.78
2
Delta StateCleveland, MS · Division IICleveland, MS · 15 swimmers
1524.2823.42 to score23.42
3
Drury UniversitySpringfield, MO · Division IISpringfield, MO · 19 swimmers
1924.3723.61 to score23.61
4
Simon FraserBurnaby, BC · Division IIBurnaby, BC · 9 swimmers
924.4424.19 to score24.19
5
Colorado MesaGrand Junction, CO · Division IIGrand Junction, CO · 16 swimmers
1624.4623.90 to score23.90
6
Catawba CollegeSalisbury, NC · Division IISalisbury, NC · 16 swimmers
1624.5423.83 to score23.83
7
IndianapolisIndianapolis, IN · Division IIIndianapolis, IN · 25 swimmers
2524.5923.95 to score23.95
8
McKendree UniversityLebanon, IL · Division IILebanon, IL · 9 swimmers
924.6224.25 to score24.25
9
Nova SoutheasternFort Lauderdale, FL · Division IIFort Lauderdale, FL · 20 swimmers
2024.7024.32 to score24.32
10
Florida TechMelbourne, FL · Division IIMelbourne, FL · 17 swimmers
1724.7224.42 to score24.42
11
West FloridaPensacola, FL · Division IIPensacola, FL · 20 swimmers
2024.7624.32 to score24.32
12
Cal State East BayHayward, CA · Division IIHayward, CA · 15 swimmers
1524.7724.14 to score24.14
13
Lynn UniversityBoca Raton, FL · Division IIBoca Raton, FL · 18 swimmers
1824.8624.51 to score24.51
14
Florida Southern CollegeLakeland, FL · Division IILakeland, FL · 20 swimmers
2025.0024.63 to score24.63
15
Northern MichiganMarquette, MI · Division IIMarquette, MI · 21 swimmers
2125.0724.21 to score24.21
16
Minnesota State MankatoMankato, MN · Division IIMankato, MN · 31 swimmers
3125.1424.83 to score24.83
17
West ChesterWest Chester, PA · Division IIWest Chester, PA · 9 swimmers
925.1624.18 to score24.18
18
Grand Valley StateAllendale, MI · Division IIAllendale, MI · 19 swimmers
1925.1823.76 to score23.76
19
Wingate UniversityWingate, NC · Division IIWingate, NC · 22 swimmers
2225.2224.33 to score24.33
20
Colorado MinesGolden, CO · Division IIGolden, CO · 20 swimmers
2025.2524.25 to score24.25
21
PennWest ClarionClarion, PA · Division IIClarion, PA · 23 swimmers
2325.3024.75 to score24.75
22
Henderson StateArkadelphia, AR · Division IIArkadelphia, AR · 13 swimmers
1325.3424.66 to score24.66
23
UNC PembrokePembroke, NC · Division IIPembroke, NC · 10 swimmers
1025.3523.59 to score23.59
24
Rollins CollegeWinter Park, FL · Division IIWinter Park, FL · 15 swimmers
1525.3924.80 to score24.80
25
Wayne State (MI)Detroit, MI · Division IIDetroit, MI · 13 swimmers
1325.4924.71 to score24.71
← PreviousPage 1 of 4Next →

Common questions

How are these programs ranked?

We order programs by their roster's median time in the 50 Free. That's the time a middle-of-the-roster swimmer goes, so the ranking reflects the whole team, not just the fastest swimmer. A program appears only when it has at least 4 swimmers rostered in the event.

Is the roster median a recruiting cutoff?

No. It is a snapshot of the current roster, not a coach-issued cutoff. A coach may recruit above or below it depending on event needs, class needs, development, academics, and available roster space.

Where do the times come from?

The actual times current swimmers have posted this 2025-26 season, pulled from program rosters — not qualifying standards or a coach's estimate.

What do score, contribute, and depth mean?

They are roster tiers. Scorer is a roster's top quarter, contributor is the middle half, and depth is the back of the roster. They describe the swimmers already on the team. See how we rank for the full method.